The Healthier Life
Receive valuable daily health tips and advice FREE by email
The Daily Health
Nutrition and Healing
Search our database of articles.

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Keyword Search
 

Related products

How To Fight Prostate Cancer & Win

How To Fight Prostate Cancer & Win

by William L. Fischer. Probably the single most important book we would recommend for those with prostate problems
more info...
Super Foods Book

NEW! . . . SUPER FOODS FOR A SUPER-HEALTHY YOU

Unleash the secret healing power of Nature's ultimate foods - & 'programme' your body to remain free of illness
more info...

Cancer

How Safe Are Mammograms? The Myths Uncovered...


Date: 23/01/12
 
Mammograms are not safe. Compression of the breast may prompt cancer to spread. And then theres the radiation. In his book, Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease, John Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. – a nuclear physicist and a medical doctor, and one of the leading experts in the world on the dangers of radiation – presents compelling evidence, that over 50 percent of the death-rate from cancer is in fact induced by x-rays. Dr. Gofman also continues to say that mammogram delivers about 1,000 times more radiation than a chest x-ray and carries a risk of cardiovascular damage... This has also been verified and well-researched by the world renowned Dr. Joseph Mercola.

Surgeon's KnifeIf you’d rather avoid an appointment with this man, then sign-up to the FREE Daily Health eletter...
where good health comes naturally!

Once a woman reaches the age of 50, she may start considering taking part in a breast-screening programme. In the UK, this means having a mammogram every three years up to the age of 64.

I hope to have some very good news for these women in about a year and a half when well get the results of a trial that will hopefully do away with mammograms forever.

Youre going to WHAT?

Women who go to a radiology clinic for their first mammogram are often surprised to find that their breasts must be squeezed between two flat surfaces so the tissue will be sparse enough to allow tumours to be revealed. And you can be certain that its not a tender squeeze.

To call this uncomfortable is a nice way of saying excruciatingly painful.

But it's also dangerous. The compression required for mammograms can actually break down cancer tissue and rupture small blood vessels that support the cancer, causing it to spread.

This is known as the compression contradiction, and heres what US physician Dr William Campbell Douglass II, has to say about it: "I find it maddeningly contradictory that medical students are taught to examine breasts gently to keep any possible cancer from spreading, yet radiologists are allowed to manhandle them for a mammogram."

When Dr. Douglass says manhandle, thats a nice way of saying squashed flat.

Sign up to The Daily Health e-letter - it’s FREE!    ("We value your privacy!")

In just 5 minutes every day, it will tell you what works, what doesn't work, and what may harm you in both orthodox and alternative medicine.


“The HSI Daily Health e-Alerts contain scattered nuggets and gems of
health and nutritional wisdom.A very useful source of information about new thinking and
innovative treatments for a wide range of conditions.” - Dr AB, FRCS
Three up...three down

Whenever I write about mammograms I always receive messages from women who feel they owe their lives to cancer detected by mammograms. I dont doubt that at all, but I still believe that mammograms will someday be viewed as barbaric and ineffective.

Three common mammography myths:

  • Mammograms are safe: In fact, they're not. Compression of the breast may prompt cancer to spread. And then theres the radiation. In his book, Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease, John Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. – a nuclear physicist and a medical doctor, and one of the leading experts in the world on the dangers of radiation – presents compelling evidence, that over 50 percent of the death-rate from cancer is in fact induced by x-rays. Dr. Gofman also continues to say that  mammogram delivers about 1,000 times more radiation than a chest x-ray and carries a risk of cardiovascular damage... This has also been verified and well-researched by the world renowned Dr. Joseph Mercola. 
  • Mammograms catch cancer at an early stage: In fact, if a tumour is large enough to be detected by a mammogram its most likely already in an advanced state.
  • Mammograms save lives: In fact, studies have shown that women who have mammograms suffer about the same rate of death due to breast cancer as women who do not have mammograms.


Reading the currents


Mammography is not the future of breast cancer detection. And Ive got a feeling that even proponents of mammography would agree with that.

In the e-alert Yet another myth concerning mammograms (14/8/03), I told you about an experimental technique called computed tomography laser mammography (CTLM); a breast imaging system that uses a combination of laser light and thermal heat (but no radiation) to produce a full colour, three-dimensional cross-section view of each breast. This method - which is quick and painless - is still being developed and tested.

Today well turn our attention to another new technique called the Breast Cancer Detection System (BCDS); a method thats also completely non-invasive and radiation-free. And best of all: no squashing.

Hear that sound? Thats the sound of female HSI members shouting in unison: Halleluiah!

BCDS technology is based on the discovery that electricity passes through cancerous tissue differently than it passes through normal tissue. A BCDS device consists of several strips containing electronic sensors that are laid over the breast in a spoke-like pattern. Very low electrical currents are transmitted into the breast without causing any pain to the patient. Diagnosis is made with computer analysis.

An American company called Z-tech is now conducting the final stage of clinical trials with an 18-month test of BCDS at 16 medical centres in the US, Canada and Europe. And you can be sure that this is a trial I'll be following very closely.

For more information on other safe breast cancer screening alternatives, read the articles below:

Mammograms – An Outdated and Painful Procedure

Thermography: A Safe and Very Effective Alternative to Mammograms

Did you find this information useful?
Then why not get more expert health recommendations just like this
delivered direct to your inbox
Sign up here to The Daily Health e-letter - it's FREE!     ("We value your privacy!")


"It is truly refreshing to read a newsletter on the topic of alternative medicine which is scientifically based and reviewed by professionals………" - Robert Sinott

Article first published in 2005. Last updated January 2012

Back to top

Click here to send to a friendShare thisPrinter friendly version

Comments

Julia Posted 08/06/2008

I see the above comments and thoughts were made back in 05 have there been any updates on your mind set since this time!!

gwen Posted 04/08/2008

Thank you so much for this information

jamie Posted 30/08/2008

Thank you for explaining the ugly truths about mammography which mainstream medicine for the most part chooses to ignore while making every attempt to bully patients into having mammograms.

Sylvia Posted 13/11/2008

agree completely. excruciating pain cannot be good. stopped cos two frozen shoulders resulted from one visit,took a year to recover with physio.

Janice Posted 06/02/2009

While there are disadvantages with the mammogram, I for one am glad for these examinations. My sister did not have any lumps, and had her first mammogram the back of last year. The results were calcifications all over one breast. She has been advised to think about a masectomy, as the highly likelyhood of these resulting in cancer in a few years time. Personally, I think the mammogram has saved her life.

Joan Byrne Posted 23/02/2009

I had a wide local incision to remove breast cancer in 2005 and had to endure a mammograph six months after the operation. I am now left with multiple lumps in that breast, I feel this is due to the extreme pressure and pain caused by that subsequent mammograph. I am dreading the next one. Is ultrasound alone not a good marker?

Administrator Posted 23/02/2009

In answer to Joan. Please read the related article posted on our website about Thermography: Thermography a Safe and Very Effective Alternative to Mammograms. All of the best.

Judy Bolger Posted 23/02/2009

This news on mamagrams does not suprise me at all as I have read it several times that they can not detect some cancer in the breasts and yes they are very painfull when your breast is squeesed between the machine.I do not like them at all and then theirs the radition.

Movementwriter Posted 14/12/2009

Last Beat,user iron answer speaker following branch claim wonder teaching hear run account must error beat sure evening draw ourselves what speak girl recognition distribution client through through early your need income point right author worry fact cabinet shout arrange huge pupil campaign cut amongst wait event aircraft bring sun cat desk president clean control little impose turn serious via flight if end once deliver official exercise something contact incident connection writing cabinet colour appointment regular accompany appeal offer pupil block conflict break growth whether provide risk screen often sell alright apparently

fouress Posted 20/12/2009

happy to read so many views on mamogram..would like to know what u wud recommend as the best, safest n most effective way of detecting breast cancer, other than self examination

CHRISTINE SCALES Posted 26/02/2010

It is a year since I received treatment for breast cancer (the whole works, chemo, lumpectomy and radiotherapy) I have radically changed my diet, done a month's detox and feel much better than before the cancer. Various medics including my consultant are keen for me to have a mammogram, which I have been refusing as I find such procedures painful and am worried about the harmful effects of the radiation. Yesterday, in an hour-long interview I felt I was being pressured into having a mammogram. My ultrsound scan was clear, but this was not regarded as sufficient evidence without a mammogram. I continued to resist, but they will be sending me an 'invitation' for a mammogram in May! What part of 'No' do they not understand? I am 59 years of age with no history of cancer in the family.

Brigitte Posted 04/04/2010

I just turned 54 and scheduled my annual check up. So far I had 9 mammograms and for a time every year, but lately was hesitant because it is so uncomfortable and painful. A friend pointed out the danger and now reading up on it myself, I will not have another mammogram. What was I thinking.

Heather Keel Posted 26/04/2010

I have never liked having a mammogram and now with all this information it doubles my reasons for not having another!

John  Posted 05/10/2010

I find the differences between Australia which believes it has superior technology and diagnosis procedures to developing countries interesting. My experience in asia, Phillipines, Thailand etc are more progressive and use normal ultrasound, for the first checkup, they then only use for diagnosis MRI and thermal imaging tech. Xrays are not used as asian women will not tolerate these tests.

sherry will Posted 05/12/2010

this is to christine . i also have had the full cancer experince. i also feel pressured into a boob vise. i am of mixed feelings. the people i was told to trust i have big douths with. i was scared and bullied by some docs! what to do /? my first mammogram i was 14 years old!

Debra  Posted 16/02/2011

What do you recommend instead right now?

Anonymous  Posted 19/03/2011

Just keep in mind: they need your explicit informed consent before they leagally can do anything to you. If you don't want something, you have every right to say no, stand your ground, and they can't touch you. :)

Valmsie Posted 29/10/2011

like Christine & Sherry I have had full breast cancer experience, mastectomy, chemo, radiation & I've read about lots of women who have found a lump a few months after their latest mammogram, which hadnt detected cancer. I had a mammogram 9 months before I found a lump, a lady I met this week found a lump 3 months after her mammogram. I was told I had dense breast tissue which is hard to detect a tumour, so why am I still being told to have a mammogram if they aren't going to be able to see it anyway. I'm very confused & not sure what to do next month re my annual check ? any suggestions. I live in Tasmania, Australia

Amy Posted 20/01/2012

Thanks for the refernces at the bottom of your articles. It's good to know we can verify what you say.



Post your comment

Name
 

Comment
(please add your comment
up to 1000 characters
Comments may take up to
4 hours to appear)
 

Email Address (not published)

Security Question
To prevent spam-related
comments please enter the
characters shown in the
CAPTCHA box to the right.
captcha




 Registered Office - Curzon House, 24 High Street,  Banstead,  Surrey SM7 2LJ.

Agora Health Limited is registered in England and Wales
with company number 7141826 and VAT number GB 629 7287 94.

Copyright 2011  © Agora Health Ltd