Environmental Health

Swine Flu: Did You Survive The First Week Of This ‘Pandemic’?

Date: 30 April, 2009

Surgeon's KnifeIf you’d rather avoid an appointment with this man, then sign-up to the FREE Daily Health eAlert...
where good health comes naturally!
I suspect, like me, you have been alarmed by the media’s coverage of the swine flu scare. Yet, by Tuesday I couldn’t help but wonder: ‘Haven’t we heard these noises before? Avian Flu, SARS, Norovirus … What happened to all of those?

Don’t get me wrong, of course we should take these things seriously. But a pandemic? Really?

How not to deal with Swine Flu

This isn’t the first time the public has been warned about swine flu. The last time was in February 1976. An outbreak of swine flu struck Fort Dix Army base in New Jersey in the US, killing a 19-year-old private and infecting hundreds of soldiers.

Concerned that the US was on the verge of a devastating epidemic, President Gerald Ford ordered a nationwide vaccination programme at a cost of $135 million (some $500 million in today’s money). Within weeks, reports surfaced of people developing Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing nerve disease that can be caused by the vaccine.

Claims totalling $1.3 billion were filed by victims who had suffered paralysis from the vaccine.

By April 1976, more than 30 people had died of Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Facing protests, federal officials abruptly cancelled the programme in December that same year. The epidemic failed to materialize.

My guess is that you can expect to see a lot of panic over this issue in the near future. But the key is to remain calm and informed…

A bit of perspective

It is very difficult to forecast a pandemic, and an inflammatory response can be extremely damaging.

On Monday 27 April, the worldwide total number of confirmed cases of Swine Flu was 82, according to World Health Organization (WHO). This included 40 cases in the US, confirmed by the Centres for Disease Control (CDC). Let’s look again: 82… Does that really warrant the feverish news headlines?

Malaria kills 3,000 people EVERY DAY, and it’s considered ‘a health problem’… Is this because there are no fancy vaccines for malaria that can rake in billions in a short amount of time?

Do you remember when President George Bush warned that 2 million Americans would die as a result of bird flu… We’re still waiting…

What is Swine Flu?

Regular swine flu is a contagious respiratory disease, caused by a type-A influenza virus that affects pigs. The current strain, A(H1N1), is a new variation of an H1N1 virus – which causes seasonal flu outbreaks in humans – it also contains genetic material of bird and pig versions of the flu.

This version has never before been seen in neither human nor animal and the symptoms are:

  • Fever of more than 100
  • Coughing
  • Runny nose and/or sore throat
  • Joint aches
  • Severe headache
  • Vomiting and/or diarrhoea
  • Lethargy
  • Lack of appetite

This does sound bad. But hold on, don’t run for the hills, or worse, for the Tamiflu vaccine yet.

Sign up to The Daily Health it's FREE!


In just 5 minutes every day, we'll tell you what works, what doesn't work, and what may harm you in both orthodox and alternative medicine.

"The Daily Health contain scattered nuggets and gems of health and nutritional wisdom.A very useful source of information about new thinking and innovative treatments for a wide range of conditions." - Dr AB, FRCS


We respect your  privacy and will never share your details with anyone else.

Why is a pandemic unlikely?

All H1N1 viruses are descendants (mutations) of the 1918 flu pandemic strain. It is due to these mutations that the flu shot may or may not work, from year to year. Therefore, there’s no vaccine available for this current hybrid flu strain, and naturally, this is feeding the fear that millions of people will die before a vaccine can be made.

Let’s remind ourselves of one very important fact: recently scientists concluded that the 1918 flu pandemic that killed between 50-100 million people worldwide in a matter of 18 months – which all our current worst case scenarios are built upon – was NOT due to the flu itself! Instead, the real culprit was strep infections: People with influenza often get what is known as a “super infection” with a bacterial agent. In 1918 it appears to have been Streptococcus pneumonia.

Why do I mention this? Simply because the world has changed since 1918.

For a ‘bird flu’ or ‘swine flu’ to turn into a human pandemic, it has to find an environment that favours both deadly virulence and ease of transmission. People living in squalor on the Western Front at the end of World War I generated such an environment, from which the epidemic of 1918 arose. (Latest reports coming from Mexico have linked the current outbreak to a local Pork packing plant and poor hygiene standards there.)

Likewise, crowded chicken farms, slaughterhouses, and jam-packed markets of eastern Asia provide another such environment, and that environment gave rise to the bird flu – a pathogen that both kills and spreads, in birds, but not in humans.

Despite the fantastic headlines and projections of MILLIONS of deaths, the H5N1 bird flu virus killed a mere 257 people worldwide since late 2003. As unfortunate as those deaths are, 257 deaths worldwide from any disease, over the course of five years, simply does not constitute an emergency worthy of much attention, let alone fear!

Reality check

As the numbers of confirmed swine flu cases are released, keep a level head and don’t let fear run away with your brains.

Let’s look at the numbers released over the past week

According to the World Health Organization’s Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response site as of April 27, there are:

  • 64 laboratory confirmed cases in U.S. – 0 deaths (latest reports show 1 death in Texas)
  • 26 confirmed cases in Mexico – 7 deaths
  • 6 confirmed cases in Canada – 0 deaths
  • 2 confirmed case in Spain – 0 deaths
  • 2 confirmed in Britain – 0 deaths (in fact they have been discharged from hospital)
  • 3 confirmed in New Zealand – 0 deaths

A member of the World Health Organisation (WHO) has dismissed claims that more than 150 people have died from swine flu, saying it has officially recorded only seven deaths around the world.

Vivienne Allan, from WHO’s patient safety programme said: ‘Unfortunately that [150-plus deaths] is incorrect information and it does happen, but that’s not information that’s come from the World Health Organisation.’

Additionally, nearly all suspected new cases have been reported as mild.

What about Tamiflu?

So far, swine flu only responds to the vaccine Tamiflu. (Of which there are stockpiles all over the world. Aren’t we lucky? As if someone knew this was going to happen…)

But don’t be fooled (again). Tamiflu will only (possibly) relieve the symptoms of swine flu. It won’t protect you against it. Remember swine flu is a mutation, it’s not been seen before so there cannot be a vaccine against it…

Tamiflu went through some rough times not too long ago, as the dangers of this drug came to light when, in 2007, the FDA finally began investigating some 1,800 adverse event reports related to the drug. Common side effects of Tamiflu include:

  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Diarrhoea
  • Headache
  • Dizziness
  • Fatigue
  • Cough

All in all, these are the very symptoms you’re trying to avoid.

More serious symptoms included convulsions, delirium or delusions, and 14 deaths in children and teens as a result of neuropsychiatric problems and brain infections (which led Japan to ban Tamiflu for children in 2007). And that’s for a drug that, when used as directed, only reduces the duration of influenza symptoms by 1 to 1 ½ days, according to the official data.

But making matters worse, some patients with influenza are at HIGHER risk for secondary bacterial infections when on Tamiflu. And secondary bacterial infections, as I mentioned earlier, was likely the REAL cause of the mass fatalities during the 1918 pandemic!

Let’s get cynical

It is almost three years since the hysteria over a bird flu epidemic swept the world. Our governments then bought billions of dollars of Tamiflu. The shelf life of Tamiflu happens to be three years.

Three years after the unsuccessful bird flu pandemic, and guess what? Along trots her ugly sister: swine flu.

Handy! Let’s shift those stockpiles of Tamiflu before its ‘Best Before Date’. Oh, and while we’re at it, let’s order more stock from the manufacturers, just to keep the ‘good’ business flowing…

Is it just me or is it a wicked old world?

Did you find this information useful?

Then why not get more expert health recommendations just like this
delivered direct to your inbox?


"It is truly refreshing to read a newsletter on the topic of alternative medicine which is scientifically based and reviewed by professionals………" - Robert Sinott

We respect your  privacy and will never share your details with anyone else.

Sources:

‘Critical Alert: The Swine Flu Pandemic – Fact or Fiction?’ by Dr. Mercola, published online 29.04.09, articles.mercola.com

‘How to Deal with Swine Flu: Heeding the Mistakes of 1976’ By Eben Harrell, published online 27.04.09, time.com

‘Swine flu alert clears old stock of Tamiflu’ published online 30.04.09, wddty.com

‘How Many People Have Died of Swine Flu So Far?’ published online 30.04.09, cynical-c.com

Print Friendly
Print Friendly
Keywords: , , ,

Comments

  1. James Posted May 27, 2009

    Of course, if we are getting cynical, we might want to mention the huge windfall that good ol’ Don Rumsfeld gets whenever Tamiflu is sold. And if we know our facts about Aspartame (AKA Nutra Sweet) we know this guy doesn’t have an honest bone in his body.

  2. Edith L Posted May 3, 2009

    I think and I worry about it that the media is really trying to make it worse than it really is. I am sure its serious and yes we want to be informed but be real. It is going to go away like the other viruses we’ve had. The media is sending a message that is going to back fire because if and when a deadly pandemic comes our way who’s gonna take it serious. They should also get their figures right – so many different stories and numbers that I have decided to not listen as often as I was.

  3. J. Colby Posted May 3, 2009

    If one should get any of the many types of flu, might I recommend Sambucol a black elderberry liquid. It counter acts these viruses and the miserable symptoms and is said to be the answer to Tamiflu . Tamiflu what a joke! The government, not to long ago, was trying to get enough iodide (or something like that) in case of radiation fallout. Remember that one? They were afraid they wouldn’t have enough to go around. That was supposed to scare us to death . Kelp tablets would work just fine.

  4. O.Butler Posted May 1, 2009

    I agree with Doug McClarty about the media overkill because we are looking at a potential “Wolf, Wolf” scenario. Fear is probably the most powerful of our emotions because it strikes at the very core of our survival instincts so it is all too easy to exploit and that is exactly what the media are doing. (It provides them with something else to talk about instead of the recession). None of us can remain on high alert against any potential danger and even fear can be over-hyped to the point where it becomes meaningless.

  5. Doug McClarty Posted May 1, 2009

    My worry is that this overkill of media coverage could lead to people not taking a future potential deadly pandemic seriously if and when it arrives.

  6. Ernie Berry Posted May 1, 2009

    It is somewhat of a pity that the media does not publicise the the toll every day in our ‘dirty’ hospitals, of the deaths from hospital aquired infections which I believe is in the region of 3000 per week. This is much more of pandemic than any mutated strain of ‘flu no matter how serious. The worst is that this is relatively simple to eradicate by screening the people who must be the major source of infections; the staff themselves.
    But mention of this elicits screams of censure from doctors and managers alike who must of course, because they are ‘health care professionals’ be innocent of any such charge. This is despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Such an uncomfortable truth is one that neither the NHS nor the Government is prepared to accept, so we are fed the statistics that show a small percentage drop or an achievement of some target or other that was set pretty low in the first place to assure it was met. In the meantime the toll continues at an alarming rate but, what the hell they are mainly old people anyway so no loss there then!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>