PRELOX - SAVE UP TO 25%
Discover the sizzling sex secret of men who stay firm after fortymore info...
Nano Superbug Zapper
Revolutionary pocket-size device kills 'super' strains of bacteria and viruses in seconds!more info...
SAFETOX - THE NATURAL, NON-TOXIC FACELIFT PHENOMENON
Watch wrinkles fade by 83% with this 5 minute-a-day facelift wondermore info...
NEW! . . . SUPER FOODS FOR A SUPER-HEALTHY YOU
Unleash the secret healing power of Nature's ultimate foods - & 'programme' your body to remain free of illnessmore info...
News & Views
Brace Yourself: The Build-Up To The 2011 Flu-Scare Has Begun!
Date: 27/09/11
'Scaremongering' is a word often used by the mainstream when
anyone challenges them or exposes the dangers of their
Pharma-concoctions! Yet, this is a definite case of the pot
calling the kettle black, especially when it comes to their
incessant push to mass medicate and vaccinate.
A case in point is a recnet alarmist statement made by Prof John Oxford, a virologist at Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, in the UK. He claims that Britain is facing one of its worst winter flu outbreaks in years and that older people will be hit harder than they have been in recent years.
Ring any bells?
Swine flu all over again
Shortly after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the H1N1 flu outbreak a public health emergency, in 2009, Prof Oxford was one of many mainstreamers who hysterically warned us that up to 750,000 people would die of Swine Flu H1N1.
We all remember what happened as this debacle unfolded: Tamiflu, an antiviral drug used to treat Bird Flu (the supposed flu pandemic of 2006), was touted as our only saving grace, until new potent vaccines were developed against the 'deadly' H1N1 virus strain. However, behind the scenes, it turned out that governments across the globe had excess stock of Tamiflu, which they needed to shift before it expired!
Once the public was cajoled into believing the H1N1 scare, the next step was to quickly develop vaccines. Big Pharma eagerly jumped at this money-spinning opportunity and their newly-developed vaccines were fast-tracked for approval without being properly tested. Before we knew what hit us, a global mass vaccination campaign began despite mounting fears about the safety and effectiveness of the new vaccines.
Much as we were scared into submission, a year later, in June 2010, the worldwide H1N1 death toll stood at 17,853. Compared to the annual death toll of ordinary seasonal flu (between 250,000 to 500,000), the H1N1 deaths made up a measly 5 per cent of that amount... Hardly the pandemic the mainstream expected!
Soon controversy erupted. Worries over the side effects of these vaccines (narcolepsy being the biggest concern), were down-played by remarks like the one from Prof David Speigelhalter, professor of the Public Understanding of Risk at the University of Cambridge, who said: "If millions of people are vaccinated then just by chance we can expect bad things to happen to some of them, whether it is diagnosis of autism or miscarriage."
Even some mainstreamers raised concerns about the whole debacle. A report, published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, revealed that the WHO guidance, issued in 2004 (used to determine whether a health threat puts the public in danger), was authored by three scientists who had previously received payment from Roche, the makers of Tamiflu, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), manufacturer of Relenza – one of the flu vaccines developed during the pandemic scare... I smell a serious case of 'conflict of interest' and 'backroom deals'.
An equally damning report, published by the Council of Europe, criticized the handling of the H1N1 pandemic by the WHO, EU agencies and national governments, and said it was a "waste of large sums of public money." It added that the reaction to the H1N1 outbreak by these groups was unjustified and that their scaremongering resulted in a distortion of public health priorities.
In fact, the only party that benefited from this despicable scenario was the vaccine makers. City analysts estimated that drug companies banked more than £4.8bn as governments stockpiled their vaccines... With money like that in their pockets, I'm sure they couldn't care less about the side effects of their poisonous concoctions!
Christmas is coming early
Since the H1N1 scare nearly three years ago, there have not been any reports about Swine Flu rearing its ugly head on a significant scale again. Yet still the H1N1 vaccine was included in last year's ordinary flu vaccine. Most likely, because many people saw through the H1N1 fallacy and refused to take the untested vaccines... leaving governments with massive stockpiles of vaccines that will expire soon. You'll also probably find that if you choose to have the flu vaccine this year, you'll have no choice in the matter: Inevitably you will be vaccinated with a dangerous and untested vaccine.
Winter is about three months away and so is Christmas... I can't help but think that it makes perfect sense for the mainstreamers to start making noises about the next flu- scare... pushing those vaccinations early to fill their pockets with a nice hefty Christmas bonus!
That's also probably why Prof Oxford gave an early reminder. According to him, the B flu-strain (normally prevalent over the winter) has been overshadowed by swine flu for the last couple of years and that's why the B strain could strike much harder this year...
When will these scaremongers realise that the public has cottoned on to the fact that false pandemic scares, like those in recent years, have become an all too familiar scenario?
You can only cry wolf so many times!
Sources:
'Critical Alert: The Swine Flu Pandemic – Fact or Fiction?' by Dr. Mercola, published online 29.04.09, articles.mercola.com
'Swine flu alert clears old stock of Tamiflu' published online 30.04.09, wddty.com
'How Many People Have Died of Swine Flu So Far?' published online 30.04.09, cynical-c.com
'Why flu vaccine may cause narcolepsy' by Rob Stein, published online 08.02.11, voices.washingtonpost.com
'Vaccination - Deception and Tragedy' published online, shirleys-wellness-cafe.com
'Do Drug Companies Secretly Favour a World Flu Pandemic?' by Dr, Mercola, published online 28.07.09, articles.mercola.com
'The 'false' pandemic: Drug firms cashed in on scare over swine flu, claims Euro health chief' by Fiona Macrae, published online 18.01.10, dailymail.co.uk
'KILLER FLU TO GRIP BRITAIN' published online 26.09.11, express.co.uk
Back to topA case in point is a recnet alarmist statement made by Prof John Oxford, a virologist at Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, in the UK. He claims that Britain is facing one of its worst winter flu outbreaks in years and that older people will be hit harder than they have been in recent years.
Ring any bells?
Swine flu all over again
Shortly after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the H1N1 flu outbreak a public health emergency, in 2009, Prof Oxford was one of many mainstreamers who hysterically warned us that up to 750,000 people would die of Swine Flu H1N1.
We all remember what happened as this debacle unfolded: Tamiflu, an antiviral drug used to treat Bird Flu (the supposed flu pandemic of 2006), was touted as our only saving grace, until new potent vaccines were developed against the 'deadly' H1N1 virus strain. However, behind the scenes, it turned out that governments across the globe had excess stock of Tamiflu, which they needed to shift before it expired!
Once the public was cajoled into believing the H1N1 scare, the next step was to quickly develop vaccines. Big Pharma eagerly jumped at this money-spinning opportunity and their newly-developed vaccines were fast-tracked for approval without being properly tested. Before we knew what hit us, a global mass vaccination campaign began despite mounting fears about the safety and effectiveness of the new vaccines.
Much as we were scared into submission, a year later, in June 2010, the worldwide H1N1 death toll stood at 17,853. Compared to the annual death toll of ordinary seasonal flu (between 250,000 to 500,000), the H1N1 deaths made up a measly 5 per cent of that amount... Hardly the pandemic the mainstream expected!
Soon controversy erupted. Worries over the side effects of these vaccines (narcolepsy being the biggest concern), were down-played by remarks like the one from Prof David Speigelhalter, professor of the Public Understanding of Risk at the University of Cambridge, who said: "If millions of people are vaccinated then just by chance we can expect bad things to happen to some of them, whether it is diagnosis of autism or miscarriage."
Even some mainstreamers raised concerns about the whole debacle. A report, published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, revealed that the WHO guidance, issued in 2004 (used to determine whether a health threat puts the public in danger), was authored by three scientists who had previously received payment from Roche, the makers of Tamiflu, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), manufacturer of Relenza – one of the flu vaccines developed during the pandemic scare... I smell a serious case of 'conflict of interest' and 'backroom deals'.
An equally damning report, published by the Council of Europe, criticized the handling of the H1N1 pandemic by the WHO, EU agencies and national governments, and said it was a "waste of large sums of public money." It added that the reaction to the H1N1 outbreak by these groups was unjustified and that their scaremongering resulted in a distortion of public health priorities.
In fact, the only party that benefited from this despicable scenario was the vaccine makers. City analysts estimated that drug companies banked more than £4.8bn as governments stockpiled their vaccines... With money like that in their pockets, I'm sure they couldn't care less about the side effects of their poisonous concoctions!
Christmas is coming early
Since the H1N1 scare nearly three years ago, there have not been any reports about Swine Flu rearing its ugly head on a significant scale again. Yet still the H1N1 vaccine was included in last year's ordinary flu vaccine. Most likely, because many people saw through the H1N1 fallacy and refused to take the untested vaccines... leaving governments with massive stockpiles of vaccines that will expire soon. You'll also probably find that if you choose to have the flu vaccine this year, you'll have no choice in the matter: Inevitably you will be vaccinated with a dangerous and untested vaccine.
Winter is about three months away and so is Christmas... I can't help but think that it makes perfect sense for the mainstreamers to start making noises about the next flu- scare... pushing those vaccinations early to fill their pockets with a nice hefty Christmas bonus!
That's also probably why Prof Oxford gave an early reminder. According to him, the B flu-strain (normally prevalent over the winter) has been overshadowed by swine flu for the last couple of years and that's why the B strain could strike much harder this year...
When will these scaremongers realise that the public has cottoned on to the fact that false pandemic scares, like those in recent years, have become an all too familiar scenario?
You can only cry wolf so many times!
Sources:
'Critical Alert: The Swine Flu Pandemic – Fact or Fiction?' by Dr. Mercola, published online 29.04.09, articles.mercola.com
'Swine flu alert clears old stock of Tamiflu' published online 30.04.09, wddty.com
'How Many People Have Died of Swine Flu So Far?' published online 30.04.09, cynical-c.com
'Why flu vaccine may cause narcolepsy' by Rob Stein, published online 08.02.11, voices.washingtonpost.com
'Vaccination - Deception and Tragedy' published online, shirleys-wellness-cafe.com
'Do Drug Companies Secretly Favour a World Flu Pandemic?' by Dr, Mercola, published online 28.07.09, articles.mercola.com
'The 'false' pandemic: Drug firms cashed in on scare over swine flu, claims Euro health chief' by Fiona Macrae, published online 18.01.10, dailymail.co.uk
'KILLER FLU TO GRIP BRITAIN' published online 26.09.11, express.co.uk
Click here to send to a friendShare thisPrinter friendly version
